10-Dec-2017, 02:31
Hello all,
My experience with active SBL's using the low/high pass parameters suggested by Waiski roved to be amazingly successful.
As it turns out I am also the owner of a pair of the much larger, 3-way Naim DBL's. I have been using them with the Naim passive crossover, which is also said to be suboptimal. I am now wondnering if it would be a good idea to get a third D200 so that I can drive the DBL's actively. Naim makes available the active SNAXO 3-6 crossover for the DBL, with specs as follows:
- input impedance: 13KOhms
- 300Hz, 3rd order
- 3kHz, 3rd order
In order to emulate that Naim SNAXO, I would need to ask Devialet to provide me with suitable configuration files for the three D200's. But would it be enough to give them the above info about the Naim crossover specs, or would i rather need to give them specs based on the kind of calculation Waiski provided mw with for the SBL's?
Many thanks,
Pierre
My experience with active SBL's using the low/high pass parameters suggested by Waiski roved to be amazingly successful.
As it turns out I am also the owner of a pair of the much larger, 3-way Naim DBL's. I have been using them with the Naim passive crossover, which is also said to be suboptimal. I am now wondnering if it would be a good idea to get a third D200 so that I can drive the DBL's actively. Naim makes available the active SNAXO 3-6 crossover for the DBL, with specs as follows:
- input impedance: 13KOhms
- 300Hz, 3rd order
- 3kHz, 3rd order
In order to emulate that Naim SNAXO, I would need to ask Devialet to provide me with suitable configuration files for the three D200's. But would it be enough to give them the above info about the Naim crossover specs, or would i rather need to give them specs based on the kind of calculation Waiski provided mw with for the SBL's?
Many thanks,
Pierre
