15-May-2018, 17:08
(15-May-2018, 16:01)zdenes Wrote:It is also a superb source. That's why the engineer (as am I) "politely" stated what he did. If you want to debate the matter further we'll probably need to take it up in a new thread.(15-May-2018, 15:50)RebelMan Wrote:Nothing wrong with a Macbook. I have a Macbook Pro myself. A perfect laptop computer.(14-May-2018, 19:55)zdenes Wrote: Mathieu said that "the Devialet is true/transparent to the source" i.e. if you improve the source you improve the SQ. When they demoed the EUR160K system with a Macbook and a 5m USB cable (for printers) I asked why they don't improve the source. His answer was that "let's say that this is the minimum performance of the system".That's because there is nothing wrong with the source.
"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."