02-Jun-2014, 14:54
The more I think about the SAM voting, the more naive the whole thing seems. By way of reminder, this is what the web page says (http://voteforsam.devialet.com/; accessed 15:29, 21/5/14):
Vote for your speakers!
Devialet will make them SAM-Ready when they receive 100 votes.
RULES
In order to determine which speakers will benefit from the exclusive SAM technology, Devialet organizes a worldwide voting campaign: choose the first speakers to take advantage of the expertise of Devialet.
The number of votes a model receives determines in which order it will pass in the Devialet laboratories.
Furthermore, to figure on the list of the future SAM compatible speakers, a speaker has to receive at least 100 votes. In order to vote and to be kept informed of the results of the campaign, each participant has to register himself with his e-mail address.
Wouldn't it have made more sense to word the bold passages in such a way as to give Devialet some wriggle room?
Matt
Vote for your speakers!
Devialet will make them SAM-Ready when they receive 100 votes.
RULES
In order to determine which speakers will benefit from the exclusive SAM technology, Devialet organizes a worldwide voting campaign: choose the first speakers to take advantage of the expertise of Devialet.
The number of votes a model receives determines in which order it will pass in the Devialet laboratories.
Furthermore, to figure on the list of the future SAM compatible speakers, a speaker has to receive at least 100 votes. In order to vote and to be kept informed of the results of the campaign, each participant has to register himself with his e-mail address.
Wouldn't it have made more sense to word the bold passages in such a way as to give Devialet some wriggle room?
Matt
Sonos Connect (W4S) > DSpeaker Antimode 2.0 > Sanders Magtech > Martin Logan Montis
Sonos Connect (W4S) > Devialet 200 > Vivid V1.5
Silver Phantoms (just the two)
London
London
