Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200
#35
(15-Jan-2017, 22:56)Dr Tone Wrote: So after a 3 hour straight session on the 220 Pro listening to music I didn't enjoy much on my 200, I've just switched back to the 200.  Quickly going over some of the same tracks...

It's on these particular tracks I finally feel the 220s fuller and more impactful bottom end. I also think the upper mids are slightly more focused on the D200 and the D200 doesn't breath because of it, these tracks come across as flat and uninvolving on the 200 because of it.

The 220s highs aren't more forgiving the treble is still as unbarable on some tracks but it breaths and with the more impactful bottom end the 220 Pro presentation help you ignore the problem and enjoy the music more.

As I mentioned before the instruments and vocals popping out the speaker adds to 220 enjoyment.

On full sounding, well recorded music these things are harder to notice.

I don't know how else to describe it, this the best I could come up with.
Are you warming to the Pro or do you think the MAC6700 still the one you would want? 
1000 Pro - KEF Blade - iFi Zen Stream - Mutec REF10 - MC3+USB - Pro-Ject Signature 12
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by mdconnelly - 21-Oct-2016, 20:54
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by brit - 21-Oct-2016, 21:02
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by brit - 21-Oct-2016, 21:32
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Damon - 21-Oct-2016, 21:43
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by baddog - 22-Oct-2016, 00:43
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 22-Oct-2016, 17:35
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Cycles2 - 23-Oct-2016, 01:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Antoine - 23-Oct-2016, 08:40
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by ogs - 01-Nov-2016, 11:04
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by davslp - 05-Nov-2016, 15:20
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Xander - 05-Nov-2016, 17:01
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by markush - 04-Dec-2016, 02:44
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Antoine - 04-Dec-2016, 14:46
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Pim - 04-Dec-2016, 22:06
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 03:51
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Cylob - 15-Jan-2017, 12:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 05:15
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 16:08
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 17:06
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 17:10
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 17:28
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 17:53
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Arjan - 15-Jan-2017, 20:32
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Confused - 15-Jan-2017, 21:21
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 22:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Confused - 15-Jan-2017, 23:06
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 23:17
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 23:26
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 16-Jan-2017, 14:28
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Damon - 17-Jan-2017, 16:52
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 17-Jan-2017, 17:02
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 17-Jan-2017, 20:15
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by AaronG - 21-Jan-2017, 14:14
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Arjan - 30-Jan-2017, 13:21
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 23-Dec-2017, 06:18

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)