Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200
#40
(16-Jan-2017, 14:28)Dr Tone Wrote:
(16-Jan-2017, 08:57)kerkhoffd Wrote: To make the comparison even harder, I think you should also listen to a 400. As the upgrade to 220 Pro comes at a cost, spending this money could also almost buy you an ex-demo 200 or companion. Going double mono has many benefits that are not subtle. It is not all about the extra power as I have written earlier.

That's an impossible comparison, dealer sold his last 200 a few weeks back.

A used D200 sell for much less than the upgrade price in Canada.  Sad

That's a shame. Would have been well worth it. Must say I was quite lucky to buy an ex-demo in The Netherlands a few months ago and happy to be able to do the comparison 200 - 220 - 400 Side by Side. But if not an option, never mind. Just enjoy either option you chose. They are both enjoyable.
Aurender N10 - Kharma Enigma Signature AES/EBU - Devialet 400 - MIT SL-Matrix 28s - Audio Physic Virgo 25 Plus - IsoAcoustics Gaia II - AudioQuest Diamond RCA-AES between Master and Companion - Silent Angel Bonn N8 - AudioQuest Diamond Ethernet cable - Keces P3 with Hifi-Tuning Supreme 3 Silver fuse - GigaWatt 16A automatic circuit breaker - Vibex One 6 Cu - Shunyata Research ΞTRON Alpha Digital and ΞTRON Z PC-10 powercords - Qobuz 24 bit Studio

The Netherlands
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by mdconnelly - 21-Oct-2016, 20:54
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by brit - 21-Oct-2016, 21:02
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by brit - 21-Oct-2016, 21:32
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Damon - 21-Oct-2016, 21:43
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by baddog - 22-Oct-2016, 00:43
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 22-Oct-2016, 17:35
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Cycles2 - 23-Oct-2016, 01:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Antoine - 23-Oct-2016, 08:40
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by ogs - 01-Nov-2016, 11:04
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by davslp - 05-Nov-2016, 15:20
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Xander - 05-Nov-2016, 17:01
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by markush - 04-Dec-2016, 02:44
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Antoine - 04-Dec-2016, 14:46
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Pim - 04-Dec-2016, 22:06
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 03:51
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Cylob - 15-Jan-2017, 12:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 05:15
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 16:08
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 17:06
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 17:10
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 17:28
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 15-Jan-2017, 17:53
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Arjan - 15-Jan-2017, 20:32
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Confused - 15-Jan-2017, 21:21
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 22:56
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Confused - 15-Jan-2017, 23:06
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 23:17
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 15-Jan-2017, 23:26
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 16-Jan-2017, 14:28
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by kerkhoffd - 16-Jan-2017, 22:19
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Damon - 17-Jan-2017, 16:52
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 17-Jan-2017, 17:02
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Dr Tone - 17-Jan-2017, 20:15
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by AaronG - 21-Jan-2017, 14:14
RE: Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by Arjan - 30-Jan-2017, 13:21
Comparing a 220 Pro to a 200 - by samsoum - 23-Dec-2017, 06:18

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)