06-May-2017, 09:12
(05-May-2017, 21:14)sam1000 Wrote:(05-May-2017, 16:28)Confused Wrote: A review of the sMS-200
https://www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/re...view-r648/
I found this to be a particularly interesting review. However, I could not help myself thinking if the author was in anyway influenced by the fact that rival Sonore pay for a sponsored section on Computer Audiophile's website? We will never know for sure!
Wow.. Shows complete bias towards the advertisers. I used to think CA was little different than other Audio Magazines/forums, but someone's going to have to pay the bills I suppose.
Actually, I did not think the article appeared to be overly biased in any way. Although, because I have only used the microRendu and have not tried the sMS-200, it is impossible for me to judge. Plus, it is worth noting that both SOtM and Sonore sponsor Computer Audiophile. I suspect that Sonore are the bigger contributor though, which did make me wonder a little. To be honest, whenever I read a review I always think through what personal agendas and biases the author may have, even for user reviews. For anyone out there that does have the sMS-200, was there anything in the article that does not look right?
1000 Pro - KEF Blade - iFi Zen Stream - Mutec REF10 - MC3+USB - Pro-Ject Signature 12