17-May-2019, 21:12
@David A: Excellent explanation. Thank you!
On my configuration via router, Roon READY was not working fine (mainly on HRs and MQAs). Roon AIR (bit-perfect asynchronous mode) had no problem at all.
Today I had setup Direct Ethernet (Gigabit) connection between my Roon Core (Windows 10 PC) and Devialet Expert, using a second network card. Then I spent many hours using/testing both Roon READY and Roon AIR...
At the end, I came to two conclusions:
So, I am wondering: why using Roon RAAT, and not Roon AIR?
I am also wondering why Roon Core playing the same track is sending to Devialet almost a double amount of information for Roon READY versus Roon AIR?
On my configuration via router, Roon READY was not working fine (mainly on HRs and MQAs). Roon AIR (bit-perfect asynchronous mode) had no problem at all.
Today I had setup Direct Ethernet (Gigabit) connection between my Roon Core (Windows 10 PC) and Devialet Expert, using a second network card. Then I spent many hours using/testing both Roon READY and Roon AIR...
At the end, I came to two conclusions:
- Switching to Direct Ethernet (Gigabit) connection made an obvious improvement to Roon READY. Still not perfect, but it is almost acceptable.
- A possible cause for Roon READY issues may be the fact that this protocol is much "heavy" for the network (and devices) than Roon AIR. Since now I have a dedicated network card for Roon Core - Devialet communication, it is easy to compare. Thus (see attached pictures):
- Average network traffic from Roon Core to Devialet is almost double for Roon READY versus Roon AIR.
- Network traffic from Roon Core to Devialet is very fluctuating for Roon READY, while for Roon AIR it is pretty steady.
- There is ~8 times more network traffic from Devialet to Roon Core for Roon READY versus Roon AIR.
So, I am wondering: why using Roon RAAT, and not Roon AIR?
I am also wondering why Roon Core playing the same track is sending to Devialet almost a double amount of information for Roon READY versus Roon AIR?