D220 Pro from the inside.

[Confused]

i think the image that the HongKong website used isn't up to date, they used the wrong image.

Is there anything specific that you noticed that makes you think that?  Obviously we do not know the exact provenance of the picture, we do not know exactly where the image came from, but one thing is clear, this is a reasonably recent picture.

As an example, if you look at the pictures in the thread per link below, you can see that almost all the boards are designated rev5, rev5.05, and similar.  We do know the provenance of this unit, it is a production D200.

https://devialetchat.com/showthread.php?tid=1834

Most of the boards in the HK website pictures are designated 6.02 or similar, fully consistent with the Pro ADH being designated V6.

What does interest me most is that the upper boards of the ADH do show some variety, both visually and in designation.  Per the Devialet white paper for the Pro, the pictures designated DAMP Expert Pro looks exactly like the one in the 1000 Pro pictures earlier in this thread, but are designated 6.00/6L. (Antoine's production unit is designated 6.01/6L)  The DAMP Expert Le 800 board in the white paper is Designated DAMP rev5.4, but it does visually look very similar to the rev6.022/4L designated board in the 220Pro HK pictures.  By contrast, the power supply, and indeed almost everything else that can be seen appears to be identical in the HK pictures when compared to the picture of Antoine's production 250Pro. 

https://www.devialet-store.nl/sites/defa...Pro-EN.pdf

Speculating, my theory is that the difference between the DAMP boards seen in the pictures relates to the cooling requirements.  The 1000 Pro boards have copper across their entire surface, and the amps themselves have a solid copper base.  Both the current 220Pro and the 'old' Expert 250/800 do not have the solid copper base, so perhaps need a DAMP board design with a lower copper surface area.  Makes some sense I think, but as I said, this last point is speculation from myself.  One thing that is certain, the HK pictures show a DAMP board designated 6.022/4L, a designation that starts with 6.  Nothing before the O'dA had a 6 designation as far as can be seen in any available images.