Personally I think this would be a step backwards unless you're interested in tinkering and/or enjoy spending money on more boxes and cables.
I'm interested to know what makes you think this would bring substantial improvements to SQ. What specifically do you think is wrong with the current clocking set-up?
As far as I can see the only input that might conceivably benefit from this is AES where the sample-rate clock is recovered from the input stream. But even then I suppose it depends on the details of how the resulting samples are re-sampled by the Devialet's internal clock, which we don't have much (any?) information about.
PS: I think you meant "word clock" rather than "world clock".
I'm interested to know what makes you think this would bring substantial improvements to SQ. What specifically do you think is wrong with the current clocking set-up?
As far as I can see the only input that might conceivably benefit from this is AES where the sample-rate clock is recovered from the input stream. But even then I suppose it depends on the details of how the resulting samples are re-sampled by the Devialet's internal clock, which we don't have much (any?) information about.
PS: I think you meant "word clock" rather than "world clock".
Roon (Mac Mini), Wilson Benesch Full Circle, Expert 1000 Pro CI, Kaiser Chiara
Warwickshire, UK
