18-Apr-2017, 11:47
(18-Apr-2017, 11:06)Hifi_swlon Wrote:(18-Apr-2017, 10:33)ssfas Wrote: p.s. A third party manufacturer/investor would of course charge other users for the (currently free) RAAT license. Such an investment would be based on it resulting in selling more hardware, as much as Roon subscriptions. The only way to limit existing Roon licensees selling on the back of Roon-status is to charge them for the license, increasing their costs or making them dump Roon.
Whatever, happens, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Ssfas (aka Stevensegal), for someone that used the term 'forum fanatics' to describe Devialetchat members, and who apparently has no interest in Roon, you seem to be devoting a huge amount of effort on the forums to try and justify why Devialet shouldn't adopt Roon's RAAT.
Despite not using Roon, you appear to be familiar with their business dealings, and an ability to see into their future. You seem equally familiar with the Roon certification process, and Devialet's business.
I guess there's more to this than meets the eye
So I guess now Devialet has huge investment, we're all about to get big bills for Spark and firmware updates (assuming they actually ever release another one).
Well perhaps Devialet are participating after all ?
1. NUC6i5SYH running ROON ROCK > ROON/AIR > Ethernet > Devialet 1000pro Core Infinity> Wilson-Benesch ACT Speakers,
or, as alternative,
2. Wyred4Sound MS-2 Server, Devialet 1000pro Core Infinity, Theta Jade CD Transport, Pure 702ES Tuner, Wilson-Benesch ACT Speakers, misc cables
UK
or, as alternative,
2. Wyred4Sound MS-2 Server, Devialet 1000pro Core Infinity, Theta Jade CD Transport, Pure 702ES Tuner, Wilson-Benesch ACT Speakers, misc cables
UK