19-Nov-2015, 13:51
From What hifi's review of the Phantom:
"We’d just like a little more subtlety and expression – each note is clear, but how it is being played isn’t always so much. It is that layer of musicality at which traditional hi-fi, even at far lesser cost, excels in ways the Phantom can’t. Generally we’d say the two shouldn’t be compared, but, at this cost, to us that level of subtlety matters."
Read more at http://www.whathifi.com/devialet/silver-...i3JOMHi.99
I know many have criticised this review because it was just a single silver reviewed, and I guess many would not believe a single word written in advert infested What hifi anyway! Having said that, there does appear to be some commonality between these comments and MountainGuy's original post?
"We’d just like a little more subtlety and expression – each note is clear, but how it is being played isn’t always so much. It is that layer of musicality at which traditional hi-fi, even at far lesser cost, excels in ways the Phantom can’t. Generally we’d say the two shouldn’t be compared, but, at this cost, to us that level of subtlety matters."
Read more at http://www.whathifi.com/devialet/silver-...i3JOMHi.99
I know many have criticised this review because it was just a single silver reviewed, and I guess many would not believe a single word written in advert infested What hifi anyway! Having said that, there does appear to be some commonality between these comments and MountainGuy's original post?
