Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To Devialet or not to Devialet
#41
(25-Feb-2015, 14:35)Pim van Vliet Wrote:
(25-Feb-2015, 14:23)Womaz Wrote: Hi
My first post on here. Looking at the possible purchase of a 120......maybe a 200 but probably stretching my finances a little.
Just looking for some guidance. I currently have the MFM6i amp and PMC 23 speakers, and i love the bass and punchy sound that gives me. I will have to demo the Devialet, but as I am up in Newcastle UK that is easier said than done. its quite a travel. Also added complication that I would like to hear it with the 23s. Just been chatting to one dealer who stocks the Devialet, and he has said I would need a high quality USB cable, about £600. Really?


Any guidance much appreciated.

You 'need' to look at another dealer. To tell you that you 'need' a 600 pound USB cable to get good sound out of a Devialet is stupid. You probably spoke with the trainee sales person who had just been told that the mark up on cables is ten fold what it is on electronics.


As for 120 or 200. Since you're used to 200W into 8 Ohm and like the punchy sound, I think you probably want to aim for a 200. 

Let us know how you're going.

Cheers,

Pim

(26-Feb-2015, 09:55)thumb5 Wrote:
(26-Feb-2015, 09:12)Womaz Wrote: Ah my apologies, I have obviously misunderstood the messages. So this can be done on both the 120 and the 200?
Or i guess that depends on what i am connecting to the Devialet and whether there are enough outputs. It might be a good idea for me to hear that at my demo too.

It seems there are two schools of thought about headphones.  Vivialet pointed out they can be connected directly to the line-level outputs (with an adapter), but I'd be a little wary of that and would use a headphone amp in between.  My thinking is that the line outputs probably aren't designed to drive what might be a fairly low impedance, which means the quality of audio you'd get from directly-connected headphones could vary depending on the characteristics of the headphones you're using.  A headphone amp is designed for the job and should be a very easy load for the line outputs to drive, hence avoiding any possible loss of quality.

Thats a very good point. when i demo taking my headphones along is a must then. The Dev appeals even more if I can just have one box, although a network player and dev would probably be my choice. Thanks
Devialet 200 -- Roon Nucleus-- Sonus Faber Olympica 2 -- Tellurium Q Black Speaker Cables --
Chord Qutest -- Niimbus US5 Pro Headphone amp —HifiMan HEK, Abyss 1266TC
Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Reply


Messages In This Thread
To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 14:23
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 16:49
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 17:55
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Ron D - 25-Feb-2015, 18:11
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Damon - 25-Feb-2015, 18:12
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 20:20
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by thumb5 - 25-Feb-2015, 20:25
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 21:22
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 21:35
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 21:50
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 22:25
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by PhilP - 25-Feb-2015, 22:44
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 22:47
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 23:34
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 25-Feb-2015, 23:39
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 23:46
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 26-Feb-2015, 08:15
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 23:47
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 09:12
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by thumb5 - 26-Feb-2015, 09:55
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 10:00
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 09:15
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 09:48
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 10:21
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 10:51
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 16:20
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by rwjr44 - 26-Feb-2015, 17:19
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 18:17
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by rwjr44 - 26-Feb-2015, 22:32
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 21:27
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 26-Feb-2015, 21:41
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 01-Apr-2015, 23:08
To Devialet or not to Devialet - by ledesc - 02-Apr-2015, 12:24
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Pim - 25-Feb-2015, 14:35
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 14:50
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 15:02
RE: To Devialet or not to Devialet - by brit - 25-Feb-2015, 15:04
To Devialet or not to Devialet - by Womaz - 25-Feb-2015, 15:55

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)