(15-Mar-2015, 09:57)ozthepoz Wrote: You probably need to demo them both and see which you prefer; for me, the 200 just didn't cut it whereas the 250 was magic.
I've compared my 200 to 250 (non pro) yesterday in my room and system (check my signature).
To be honest there was no comparison.
The 250 sounded classes above 200 in every area of sound.
If I would have say in short 250 is organic and natural and 200 on the other side artificial and digitally sounding (in direct comparison).
LG b7 ,atlas mavros optical(glass),Devialet expert 1000 pro ci ,isoacoustics orea bronze,audioquest nrg-z3x2 ,audioquest niagara 1200,audioquest nrg-z3,mcru wall socket ,Atlas mavros speaker cable,KEF Reference 1 ,Synergistic research orange x3 and black x1 (13a UK plug
