Posts: 161
Threads: 17
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation:
3
I would also say the 250 pro is better than a 400. When I have compared the 250 and the 440, I liked the 250 more. It has a more refined sound. But that may depend on the speakers.
Spiral Groove/Soundsmith - jRiver/Audiophile Optimizer/Process Lasso - Devialet 1000 pro - Rockport Ankaa
Nordost Valhalla, Brahma, Frey2+ & Tyr2/Ansuz Mainz C/D8
Isoacoustics OREA/Shunyata Dark Field/Nordost QV/QK
Devialet Gemini
Posts: 19
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
0
16-Jan-2021, 09:21
(This post was last modified: 16-Jan-2021, 09:23 by weberan.)
It might depend on the power, yes.
On the other hand I have the feeling, that after my upgrade to the 1000 some kind separation in the stage is available again, I actually missed with the 250 Pro and I liked so much with the 400.
And yes: the sound signature of the 250 Pro is different (I like both though). I even have been happy with the 120 some years ago.
Gauder Berlina RC7 mk2 > Devialet 1000 Pro > Mac Mini > Audirvana
Posts: 576
Threads: 4
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
20
I would expect that a 440pro sounds better (al least equal) than a 250pro: more power and the benefits of a mono amp.
Here my choice would be the 440pro. The 400 is a different story, the improvements of the pro platform are much bigger than the differences in power. At least for 99% of all speakers...
With a 1000pro you are on the safe side :>)